CNPP Disowns Report Commending Engr. Simbi Wabote, Asks NCDMB Boss To Clear His Name in US Court over Perjury Allegations
….Says CNPP, CSOs’ 21-Day Ultimatum Against NCDMB Boss Stands
….Considers Legal Action Against Online Media Platforms
Conference of Nigeria Political Parties (CNPP) has said that its
21-day ultimatum, in collaboration with a coalition of civil society
organisations (CSOs), demanding that the Executive Secretary of the
Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB), Engr. Simbi
Kesiye Wabote, steps aside for a thorough investigation of allegations
of corruption against him stands.
The CNPP in a statement signed by its Secretary General, Chief Willy
Ezugwu, while reacting to a fake news commending the NCDMB boss, urged
members of the public to disregard the media report published by some
online media platforms, saying its considering legal options against
publishers of the fake report.
The report had claimed that “the National Secretary of the Conference
of Nigerian Political Parties (CNPP), Chief Willy Ezeogu, has
commended the Executive Secretary of the Nigerian Content Development
and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) over his exceptional performance in
office.”
The publication also claimed that “Ezeogu also dissociated himself
from the call on the Executive Secretary of the Nigerian Content
Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) to step aside for a thorough
investigation of allegations of corruption against him within 21
days.”
“However, in its reaction, the CNPP described the report as fake news
which was poorly cooked and packaged in desperate move to misinform
the public.
“First, the CNPP has no National Secretary position and the Secretary
General of the CNPP is not Chief Willy Ezeogu but Chief Willy Ezugwu.
“Secondly, the claim that the CNPP scribe “was misinformed about the
leadership of the Executive Secretary at the NCDMB and his positive
impacts on the country’s oil and gas sector” is far from the truth.
“In this light, the CNPP is weighing legal options against media
organizations which published such fake reports attributed to the
umbrella body of all registered political parties and political
associations in Nigeria.
“The issues CNPP and a coalition of civil society organisations (CSOs)
raised had nothing to do with whatever achievements or otherwise of
Engr. Simbi Kesiye Wabote as Executive Secretary of NCDMB.
“The NCDMB boss has obviously taken his alleged desperation to cover
up his track and obstruct the course of justice too far by this latest
sponsored fake news.
“As a matter of fact, in a statement signed by the National
Coordinator of the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria
(HURIWA), Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko last Thursday, the organisation
had while standing by the CNPP’s call on Engr. Wabote to step aside
for thorough investigation, queried the source of funding for his
legal action in the court in United States, which is usually very
expensive and paid in dollars.
“We strongly reiterate our demand that Engr. Wabote should step down
to allow for open investigation into corruption and perjury
allegations against him by a Nigerian journalist based in the United
States”, the umbrella body of all registered political parties and
political associations in the country said.
The CNPP then recalled that recently the media reported that Mr. Simbi
Kesiye Wabote, Executive Secretary, Nigerian Content Development and
Monitoring Board (NCDMB) allegedly risks contempt sanction and a
possible jail for alleged perjury and lying on oath in a libel case he
instituted against the US base Nigerian journalist, Jackson Ude.
The libel suit against the journalist was instituted in a United
States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Attorney to Ude from Amadi Law Office at 204 Blossom Street Extension,
Suite A. Lynn MA 01901, Barr. Beneth O. Amadi, had in a letter dated
January 15, 2022 and addressed to the Honourable Joseph F. Leeson,
Jr., United States District Judge, Eastern District of Pennsylvania,
504 West Hamilton Street, Suite 3401, alleged that Wabote perjured
(lied on oath) in his response to interrogatories.
The court had on Tuesday, December 21, 2021 ordered Wabote, to provide
“full and complete responses to defendant’s interrogatories”, as the
court was not satisfied with earlier responses provided by Wabote and
his counsel.
But in his reaction to the responses by Wabote to the interrogatories,
counsel for Defendant (Ude) wrote to the court demanding sanction for
“Plaintiff (Wabote) and his Attorneys for committing fraud on the
court, for perjury and for acting in subornation of perjury in this
case.”
Alternatively, the Defendant’s lawyer requested “for an order of this
court mandating the Plaintiff and his attorneys to appear and show
cause why they should not be held in contempt and/or sanctioned by
this court.
Part of the letter as quoted in the media stated thus:
“Dear Judge Leeson, Jr.,
“I am the counsel for the Defendant in this case. It is very painful
that the Defendant is making this request in this case. But this has
become necessary because Plaintiff and his Attorneys, Michael Cilento
and David D. Lin, have deliberately and remorselessly committed fraud
on this court with the knowing intention of derailing the course of
justice and torpedoing Defendant’s access to justice in this case. The
Plaintiff has consistently perjured himself and has lied on oath in
his discovery responses; while Plaintiff’s Attorneys have consistently
encouraged him and have acted in subornation of perjury, to the
prejudice of the Defendant and in violation of Defendant’s due
processes of law rights. Defendant hereby asks for deterrent sanctions
against them.
“Defendant respectfully asks the Court to impose the necessary
sanctions, or in the alternative, for an order mandating the Plaintiff
and his Attorneys, Michael Cilento and David D. Lin, to appear and
show cause why they should not be sanctioned by this court for fraud
on the court, for committing perjury, and for acting in subornation of
perjury.
“Plaintiff deliberately perjured himself and lied on oath in his
discovery [Interrogatory] responses in this case. Plaintiff’s
Attorneys are fully aware of plaintiff’s conduct. But they acted to
encourage Plaintiff, covered up the violations and acted in
subornation of perjury. These conducts have prejudiced Defendant’s
access to justice, and has frustrated Defendant’s ability to honestly
defend himself in this case.
“Defendant’s Interrogatory #11 to the Plaintiff requested Plaintiff
to: Identify and clearly state all and every bank, no matter where
located, where you have maintained any bank account from 2010 to the
present, whether still in operation or closed. See Exhibit A.
“In the Plaintiff’s response to this Interrogatory #11, Plaintiff lied
on oath and deliberately refused to disclose all his bank accounts.
See Exhibit A, para 11. Plaintiff signed this document on oath and
under the pains and penalties of perjury.
“In responding to Defendant’s Interrogatory #11, Plaintiff also
fraudulently left out several of his bank accounts, especially, his
bank accounts with the Zenith Bank of Nigeria and Fidelity Bank of
Nigeria.
“On or about December 19, 2021, Defendant received the copy of a
Petition written by Nigeria’s Transparency and Accountability against
the Plaintiff, Wabote. Please see Exhibit B. The said petition was
directed to the Nigerian Code of Conduct Bureau.
“This Exhibit B reveals Plaintiff’s bank accounts with the Zenith Bank
of Nigeria (Account No. 1013755048) and Fidelity Bank of Nigeria
(Account No. 4010268127). But Plaintiff deceitfully failed to include
these accounts in his response to Defendant’s Interrogatory #11. See
Exhibit A, paragraph 11.
“The Plaintiff’s counsels were immediately made aware of Exhibit B.
Plaintiff’s counsels saw these information and knew that Plaintiff
lied on oath. But they took no corrective measure, to the Defendant’s
detriment and against the honest administration of justice.”
Wabote and his Attorneys had in response to Interrogatory #11 admitted
that the Plaintiff had bank accounts with Bank of America, HSBC Dubai,
First Bank Nigeria, Standard Chartered Bank Nigeria, SunTrust Bank
Nigeria without listing their account numbers.
According to Ude’s attorney, Wabote “fraudulently left out several of
his bank accounts, especially, his bank accounts with the Zenith Bank
of Nigeria and Fidelity Bank of Nigeria.”
The letter continues: “Additionally, in #1 of Defendant’s second set
of Interrogatories to the Plaintiff, Defendant specifically asked
Plaintiff to: Please clearly, fully and specifically state your
monthly income (from whatever source) and expenses, and stating
clearly and specifically the sources of your stated income, from 2019
to the present.
“But notwithstanding the fact that Plaintiff secretly runs a private
registered corporation “with interest in landing state contracts,” as
revealed by and in Exhibit B, Plaintiff again lied on oath and failed
to reveal this company and the illicit flow of funds, in his response
to this Interrogatory #1. Please see Exhibit C. This deception was
also made on oath. Plaintiff’s said corporation is TEE and T Concepts
Nigeria Limited, incorporated in Yenagoa, Nigeria with Registration
Number 419331.
“Plaintiff’s attorneys are fully aware of these deceptive
misrepresentations. But the Plaintiff’s attorneys acted to cover up
the lies, in subornation of perjury and to encourage the frauds on the
court, to the prejudice and detriment of the Defendant and justice.
“The actions of the Plaintiff and his Attorneys were calculated to
interfere with this court’s ability to impartially adjudicate this
case by improperly influencing this court and/or unfairly hampering
the presentation of the Defendant’s defenses in this case.
“A ‘fraud on the court’ occurs where it can be demonstrated, clearly
and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some
unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial
system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly
influencing the trier or unfairly hampering the presentation of the
opposing party’s claim or defense.” Rockdale Mgmt. Co. v. Shawmut
Bank, N.A., 418 Mass. At 598, quoting from Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp.,
892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989).
“Truth needs no disguise. Hazel Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire
Co., 322 U.S. 238247 (1944). An effective judicial system depends on
the honesty and integrity of lawyers who appear in their tribunals.
Matter of Finnerty, Thomas E., 418 Mass. 821, 829. The Plaintiff and
his Attorneys are not forthright. They have soiled the integrity of
the legal system. Navarro-Ayala v. Nunez, 968 F.2d 1421, 1426 (1st
Cir. 1992) (“Courts cannot function if lawyers and litigants are not
forthright.”). It is part of a lawyer’s overall obligation to the
court, and to the judicial system, to help that system function
properly to achieve the just resolution of controversies; and which is
“meant, in some small degree, to enlist the bar in the enterprise of
administering the law, thereby making it more difficult for the strong
or wealthy, to use the very costs of the legal system to undermine its
basic objectives.” Unanue-Casal v. Unanue-Casal, 898 F.2d 839, 842
(1st Cir. 1990). Defendant’s request for sanctions should be allowed
in the interest of justice.
Defendant’s Requests:
“Defendant asks for sanctions against the Plaintiff and his Attorneys
pursuant the inherent jurisdiction of this court to do justice, and
pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(A)(i)-(vi) for the Plaintiff’s
truncation of the discovery process and the commission of frauds on
the court.
“Alternatively, Defendant asks for an order mandating the Plaintiff
and his Attorneys to appear and show cause why they should not be held
in contempt of court, and/or be sanctioned severely. Tampering with
the administration of justice in the manner exhibited herein involves
more than an injury to a single litigant. Hazel-Atlas, at 246.
Additionally, pursuant to 37(b)(2)(C), Defendant requests that the
Plaintiff and his Attorneys be ordered to pay for the Defendant’s
attorneys’ fees and expenses
