News

ICC prosecutor seeks investigation into abduction of Nigerian schoolchildren

The prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) is set to
seek authorisation from the Pre-Trial Chamber of the court to open an investigation into cases of abduction of schoolchildren in several
parts of Northern Nigeria, closure of schools, and the persistent
failure of Nigerian authorities at both the federal and state levels
to end the abduction.

The ICC prosecutor’s decision followed a petition sent to the court by the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP).

This development was disclosed on Sunday in a statement by SERAP deputy director, Kolawole Oluwadare.

SERAP had in the petition dated 4 September 2021 urged the ICC
prosecutor, Mr Karim A. A. Khan, QC, to “push for those suspected to
be responsible and complicit in the commission of these serious
crimes, to be invited and tried by the ICC.”

In the petition, SERAP argued that, “The severe and lifelong harms
that result from depriving children the right to education satisfy the
gravity of harm threshold under the Rome Statute.”

Responding, the ICC prosecutor in a letter with reference number
OTP-CR-363/21, and dated 22 October 2021 confirmed to SERAP that “the criteria for opening an investigation into a string of abductions and closure of schools in some parts of Nigeria have been met.”

The letter signed on the prosecutor’s behalf by Mark P. Dillon, Head
of the Information and Evidence Unit, read in part: “On behalf of the
Prosecutor, I thank you for your communication received on 13/09/2021, as well as any subsequent related information.”

“The preliminary examination of the petition is considered complete.
Under Article 53 of the Rome Statute, the next step in the judicial
process is for the Prosecutor’s Office to prepare and submit a request to the Pre-Trial Chamber for authorisation to open an investigation on Nigeria.”

“Once submitted, the request will be made publicly available on the
Court’s website: www.icccpi.int.”

“Your communication will be forwarded to the relevant team to be
analysed, together with other related communications and other
available information, in the context of any future investigations. We
thank you for your interest in the ICC.”

SERAP deputy director, Kolawole Oluwadare said: “By this decision, the ICC prosecutor has taken a significant step toward ensuring that those suspected to be responsible for grave crimes against Nigerian
schoolchildren are exposed, and held to account.”

“The victims of these crimes deserve justice. Impartial justice and
reparation will deal a decisive blow to impunity of perpetrators, and
improve access of Nigerian children to education. SERAP will work
closely with the ICC to achieve these important objectives.”

SERAP’s petition to the ICC prosecutor, read in part: “Senior
government officials know well or ought to know that their failure to
prevent these crimes will violate the children’s human rights and
dignity.”

“The absence of any tangible and relevant investigation or prosecution in Nigeria suggests that the authorities are unwilling or unable to carry out genuine investigation or prosecution of those suspected to be responsible for and complicit in the abduction of students.”

“The consequences of persistent abductions of students, closure of
schools, and the failure to provide safe and enabling learning
environments despite federal and state authorities yearly budgeting
some N241.2 billion of public funds as “security votes”, are similar
to those of the offences in article 7(1).”

“More than 10,000 schools have been reportedly closed in at least
seven northern states over the fear of attack and abduction of pupils
and members of staff. The states are Sokoto, Zamfara, Kaduna, Kano,
Katsina, Niger and Yobe.”

“Among the string of abductions in Zamfara was the abduction of over 200 schoolgirls in the town of Jangebe in February. The latest
abduction comes after widespread reports of abduction of students and closure of schools in many states of Nigeria, including in
north-central Niger State where some 91 schoolchildren were abducted.”

“An estimated 1.3 million Nigerian children have been affected by
frequent raids on schools by suspected terrorists. Some 13 million
Nigerian children are out of school nationwide. According to the
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), more than 1,000 students have been abducted from schools in northern Nigeria since December 2020.”

“Families and parents have reportedly resulted to paying the
terrorists thousands of dollars as ransom to secure the release of
their children. An estimated $18.34 million was reportedly paid in
ransoms between June 2011 and the end of March 2020.”

“Nigerian authorities have also failed and/or neglected to
satisfactorily address the abduction of 276 schoolgirls from Chibok in 2014, which prompted the #BringBackOurGirls campaign. According to reports, more than 100 of those girls are still missing.”

Nigeria is a state party to the Rome Statute and deposited its
instrument of ratification on 27 September 2001, thus giving the court jurisdiction over crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes committed on its territory or by its nationals.

The ICC prosecutor decided to seek an investigation after undertaking a preliminary examination of the cases of abduction of children in the country.

A three-member panel of ICC pre-trial judges will consider whether to grant the prosecutor’s request, once it is submitted, to let the ICC
step in as a court of last resort.

Judges will rely on the materials submitted by the prosecution to
determine whether there is a “reasonable basis” to proceed. Victims
and their families may also make their views known to the pre-trial
chamber.

If the investigation identifies suspected perpetrators of the crimes
alleged in SERAP’s petition, prosecutors can ask judges to issue
international arrest warrants, which can remain under seal to help
authorities apprehend those charged.

As an international court of last resort, the ICC is mandated to bring
to justice people suspected to be responsible for war crimes, crimes
against humanity, and genocide when national courts are unable or
unwilling to do so.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button